Alex Jones calls into Infowars Live, with Owen Shroyer hosting, to give a detailed update to the fight for free speech, of which the epicenter is at the Infowars studios.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family:
Follow Alex on TWITTER –
Like Alex on FACEBOOK –
Infowars on G+ –
:Web:
:Subscribe and share your login with 20 friends:
Funding the Infowar is more important than ever!
Visit to get the latest books, documentaries, Infowars swag, survival & preparedness gear & nutritional products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.
Sign up for the Infowars daily newsletter to become an 'Underground Insider' & bypass censorship bots of social media plus get exclusive content + coupon codes for our shop!
INFOWARS HEALTH – START GETTING HEALTHY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE –
The Alex Jones Show ©copyright, Free Speech Systems.LLC 1995 – 2017 All Rights Reserved. May use for fair use and educational purposes
#AlexJones #Infowars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ1IPdrqyY8
Hi.
Greetings from canada
Hi .
It says zero views even though there are comments!
Just assume from now on that all thumbs up and view counts are utter trash, at the time of writing this the video has 50 views and 84 thumbs up, ha.
164 views
YT and Google Sucks!
So glad that the government is going after rogue California!
JesusFreakJene whut the fk u mean the government is goin after commiefornia? That would deflect part of there globalist disarming lighting the constitution on fire plan.
Anonymous Maximus
Sorry, but your comment was difficult to comprehend.
is California just going to fall into the ocean already… ugh…. that state is ridiculous.
DIvest from Google,Twitter n FB stock . Boycott the platforms when possible. Contact institutional money managers and urge them to divest ,or at least lessen their positions in these un-American, censoring, oppressive and monopolistic leftist/globalist entities ….
I live in California and I happen to be a college student…. lol it’s like 90% far left madness… I know a lot of conservative people but we’re huge minority…. Beautiful real estate, it’s too bad they don’t occupy Utah or Wyoming instead of the entire west coast…
HATE SPEECH LAW – THE CURE THAT’S FAR WORSE THAN THE DISEASE
In the debate between free speech supporters and advocates of hate speech law, free speech supporters argue that, yes unfortunately in society there is a terrible disease called hate speech. However, despite this, the ONLY speech that should be criminally penalised is threatening speech and speech that incites violence. We do have to think about things that can be done to lessen hate speech in society (about which see later), but making hate speech laws is not the answer. Why? – because the proposed cure for hate speech, hate speech law, IS FAR WORSE THAN THE DISEASE of hate speech. Of course there is a price that we have to pay for this allowance of freedom of speech, and that price is the possibility of being badly offended or upset by what others say, but this is a far lesser evil and price to pay than the negative outcomes that hate speech laws produce in a society or have on an individual.
What are the negative outcomes of hate speech laws for a society or for an individual?
• The only way to discover truth is through fully free and open debate. Without free speech an individual and society loses the ability to discover truth. This very fundamental and valuable knowledge is lost. A terrible outcome.
• Hate speech laws stop people from saying what they really think, because everyone starts worrying that what they say will get them into serious legal trouble or make them lose their job. This means that totally free debate and the free flow of ideas are stopped. The positive outcomes that could have arisen from this free flowing debate and totally honest dialogue are all lost to society. Totalitarian states are always less creative and productive than free states.
• The fully free market place of ideas can flush out bad ideas. By exposing bad ideas to the disinfecting light of free speech we can improve society.
• With hate speech laws society becomes an Orwellian nightmare where everyone is afraid that other people will report on them. In addition some people will make false hate speech claims for revenge or other purposes. This would be a terrible society to live in.
• Hate speech laws can be used in a political way to further a political agenda by preventing political opponents from putting their case forward – a terrible outcome for society.
• In denying someone else’s speech you are denying yourself (and society) the right to learn something that might change your life (or society) for the better. That is, free speech is not only about the other person’s right to speak, it is also about your right/need to hear and be exposed to ideas different from your own.
• To paraphrase George Orwell, if free speech means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they don’t want to hear. If this freedom is lost, society loses the ability to improve.
• The person who says something outrageous, in your eyes, may have put a lot of thought into what they have said and, even if outrageous to you, there may be a grain of truth in what they have to say that both you and the rest of society may learn a lot from.
• Other people’s outrageous views, in your eyes, may force you to look again at what you believe and why you believe it, making you go back to first principles and improving your understanding of why you believe what you believe and your understanding of the issues involved. A very valuable outcome.
• If you and society in general are shielded from different ideas and perspectives you (and society) will not reach your (and societies) maximum potential.
• If people can’t say what they truly feel, they may become frustrated and take more aggressive or violent routes to vent the issues that they feel strongly about.
• It is particularly important to defend the speech of the person who thinks differently. That person may be you one day.
• The FIrst Amendment of the USA was particularly passed in order to allow a minority to say what the majority may find offensive. You may find yourself in that minority one day.
• By curtailing the free speech of others, you may in future find that you yourself are prevented from speaking, that is, you are in potentia creating a rod for your own back.
• In the USA you have no right to be free from being offended. If you don’t like what you hear it is up to you to debate and counter what you disagree with.
In addition we have to ask these questions
• Who would you want to entrust to decide, for you, what hate speech is?
• What individual on earth is uniquely qualified to make this critical decision for you?
• Who is to decide, for you, where the line is to be drawn between speech and hate speech?
• Do you want to be ruled by what is in effect a “Thought Police”?
• Once we as a society lose critical thought and freedom of speech what is left between us and totalitarianism?
In Conclusion
• Nobody should be in fear for their liberty for speech, unless it is threatening speech or speech inciting violence. Apart from these two exceptions it should never be “you can have free speech, BUT”. There should be NO BUTS.
• Hate speech laws produce far more pernicious results for societies and for individuals than beneficial results. As they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
What CAN be done to reduce hate speech in society?
Of course some groups are more vulnerable to hate speech than others, so what CAN be done to protect these groups and reduce hate speech in a society?
Civility and respect codes can be used instead of implementing hate speech laws. People tasked with drawing up such speech codes should be chosen from across the political spectrum with equal numbers from the left and right. What these codes should be can be controversial, so they need to be thought about carefully before coming to a final consensus. The “policing” of these hate speech codes should also be carried out by people chosen from across the political spectrum and all hearings and rulings should be fully open to public scrutiny.
Within an institution such as a university a very high burden of proof would be required for people making hate speech complaints. If the proof was deemed good enough, the person deemed as making hateful comments could be given a lot of warnings before they are temporarily suspended. There would never be any legal prosecution for hate speech. They would be allowed to return to their job after a reasonable period of time and given more chances to resolve the situation. A faculty member would only lose their a job for example or a student would only be expelled from a university after a lot of repeated transgressions of this code. That is, the people in institutions would be secure in knowing that they could speak freely. They would know that if anything they said was deemed as offensive by someone, the person complaining would have to have a very well proven complaint. They would also know that the civility codes had been decided upon by a group of people chosen from across the political spectrum. They would also know that they would not be in fear for their job except under extreme circumstances and would never face legal action. They would have plenty of time and chances to turn the situation around.
Outside of institutions eg in public spaces, civility and respect rules could also be in place, again with high levels of evidence required for reporting to police. The police could be required to give for example four or more warnings to someone and only after this could they ban that person from a public space. This would be temporary, for a specified period of time, but no legal action would be taken.
On social media people could be temporarily suspended for repeated transgressions of hate speech rules but would never be banned or penalised legally.
This much more lenient civility code system would mean that the vital free flow of ideas in institutions, on social media and in society generally, would not be restricted by fear.
Daily Mail UK. ” Judge blasts Britain First leaders for their ” hostility to Muslims & immigrants”. ” found guilty of hate crimes “. For the love of God….give us a break.
I hope it’s not to late for us. We the people.
Trump bought us all time, use it.
Dismantle YouTube.
They risk prison….meanwhile, Muslims can publicly burn our flag…demand that our troops be burned on return to the UK…….sick of it….absolutely sick of it.
The Communist party shouldn’t be allowed to exist in this country, let alone be allowed to bring forth a lawsuit!
Little Red Hen That would mean eliminating the democrat party.
It’s not allowed. There’s a law banning it but nothing is done becsuse judges rule it constitutional even though it isn’t since its goal is to,take,over. I fear communists will gain power
EastCoast Podcast Don’t fear them, just understand what they are doing and fight it to the death. If they kill us at least we know we fought. If we don’t fight they will kill us anyway.
YOU WILL NOT TAKE AWAY OUR GUNS!!!!!!
Trump has sold you out
You can have my guns when you carry out my body
you are so full of it you are so quick to judge
myboythom lol!! If you think that then u haven’t been paid attention.
The guys in the army have no guns…only on the battle field.
I always tell people pay attention to what they are really doing and not the government supplied distractions.
Corsi says Trumps on it!
Who woke up Sessions?
Probably the fact that the mayor in Oakland committed a felony so
OMAR the TENTMAKER Trump got online and found an “electric training collar” for dogs. Works great for zapping a little yapper into doing what you tell it too.
The globalists are Anti-everything pertaining to what makes sense
Please watch Lisa Haven’s last video! Obama’s 30,000 army. what the left is doing, it’s shocking!
It’s not time to relax people! The fight is just beginning, watch the video to see how you can help.
Sandi C: Do you have a link for that?
Our President will protect our constitution and our freedom
keep hope alive baby!
GET TO THE VOTING BOOTHS EARLY! POST TATE! Do not let your dead relatives vote Democrat again! If they lived in your area! Make sure they’re crossed off EARLY! The only way we’ll swap this fly is together! If you’re receiving this transmission you are the resistance! the Democrats intellectually stole our saying “resistance”
laura Smith the left stole our saying “ we are the resistance “ absolutely.
Cnn are the CIA. They should be prosecuted and shut down. Cnn cannot call themselves a news media. They are so obviously against the American people and the world and they are CIA traitors the lot of them.
And do everything they can to keep us away from the truth and what matters