Alex Jones talks about how Nugent is straight edge and how he is the only guy that gave up 40 million dollars in the last year.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family:
Follow Alex on TWITTER –
Like Alex on FACEBOOK –
Infowars on G+ –
:Web:
:Subscribe and share your login with 20 friends:
Funding the Infowar is more important than ever!
Visit to get the latest books, documentaries, Infowars swag, survival & preparedness gear & nutritional products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.
Sign up for the Infowars daily newsletter to become an 'Underground Insider' & bypass censorship bots of social media plus get exclusive content + coupon codes for our shop!
INFOWARS HEALTH – START GETTING HEALTHY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE –
The Alex Jones Show ©copyright, Free Speech Systems.LLC 1995 – 2017 All Rights Reserved. May use for fair use and educational purposes
#AlexJones #Infowars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTqyDw3U9_4
We have to fight back.
FLAG ALL THE CNN VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE.
how do you flag and make it stick to them. so many options
why flag? they wont censor cnn. theyre on the same team!! lol
Injustice Served Haha! Yeah they sure are
Lucian Anton great idea i wish i had come up with it im in
Ted Nugent is a patriot
Bass cannon Jake Yah, Ted Nugent is a very smart patriot too!
He needs to grab NRA by the horns, and set them right.
And a 6’2″ elf.
I met Mr. Nugent back in 1986 at a Michigan County Fair. I was 12. He shook my hand like I was a man and asked me what I liked to do for fun. I said, “hunting and fishing.” He squeezed my hand a little harder and said, “Love it young man, just remember to respect what God gave us!” Now I am a grown man with children of my own. GOD bless TED!!!!!!!
Chuck Shumer fire fire argument
By CHARLES C. W. COOKSenator Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) in Washington, January 30, 2012His analogy is a dreadful one.
With a dreary predictability, Senator Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) shared with yesterday’s Senate hearing his “fire in a theater” argument for gun control. Schumer, as anyone who follows his exploits will be aware, is fond of this line. Adumbrating his opposition to the allegedly pernicious influence of Citizens United, the senator made the underlying point explicit: “I believe there ought to be limits because the First Amendment is not absolute. No amendment is absolute.” In an op-ed on December 23 of last year, he moved his attentions a little farther down the Bill of Rights: “While the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, no one has a right to falsely shout ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theater. . . . Likewise, the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms also comes with limits.” Thus, Schumer told the Senate hearing, we can ban “assault weapons” with little trouble.
This fire-in-a-theater jazz is a favorite of the less historically literate among America’s false-compromisers, most of whom know neither that the phrase was a (defective) analogy and not a legal doctrine, nor that the case from which it comes was subsequently overturned with some prejudice. Also generally unknown, but crucial, is what Oliver Wendell Holmes and his colleagues were (unanimously) doing in that case. Nine to nothing, they were upholding the Espionage Act of 1917, that baleful resurrection of the Alien and Sedition Acts that so stained the liberty of the republic during its brief flirtation with fascism. In doing so, Holmes and Co. were endorsing the half-year prison sentence that had been inflicted upon the plaintiff, Russian exile and secretary of the Socialist party Charles Schenck, for having the temerity to oppose in public his new country’s involvement in World War I.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is a detestable irony that in exchange for handing out anti-draft leaflets reading, “Do not submit to intimidation” and “If you do not assert and support your rights, you are helping to deny or disparage rights which it is the solemn duty of all citizens and residents of the United States to retain,” Schenck was not only put in prison but used as a symbol to signal the court’s pusillanimity in the face of the Wilson presidency: a majority upholding a majority against the little guy. And on what grounds? Because the United States, whose nearest border lay more than 3,000 miles away from the horrors of the Western Front, was ostensibly in “clear and present danger,” and Schenck’s leaflets — not even written in English — were such a mortal menace to the war effort that they had to be repressed.
“Because the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic,” the Court reasoned, the Wilson administration could imprison anti-war types whose words damaged recruiting, or even just “morale.” If that sounds silly, rest assured that it was. But it was worryingly common to the era. The Holmes Court held pretty much the same thing in a trio of cases over the next couple of years, sending Eugene Debs to prison for anti-war socialism, incarcerating a newspaperman named Jacob Frohwerk for criticizing the government in print, and shutting down German newspapers in Philadelphia for their intentions to “chill and check the ardency of patriotism.” A rotten principle indeed. That anybody should quote these incidents, a nadir of American democracy, in defense of his position is grim. That a U. S. senator should do so is unconscionable.
ADVERTISEMENT
What it has to do with firearms is anybody’s guess; perhaps Schumer’s conception of equal protection is that if one amendment can be violated, they all can. In any case, it is perhaps fitting that he should draw on Holmes’s witless aphorism to help make his case. If you thought it was absurd to draw a line between a handful of Yiddish leaflets and the survival of the American republic, you’ll doubtless like Schumer’s link between assault weapons and a “clear and present danger” to the republic. Put simply, they’re not: FBI statistics from 2010 show that rifles — not “assault” rifles, just rifles — are responsible for fewer deaths in the U.S. than are handguns, shotguns, knives, and “hands, fists, and feet.” In 2010, a total of 358 people were killed with rifles, which means that, even if American crime were geographically uniform, you’d have only around a one in a million chance of being one of them in any given year. This is about the same chance as being struck by lightning or of President Obama’s going skeet shooting at Camp David.
Charles Schenck and his ilk, Christopher Hitchens observed, “were the ones shouting fire when there really was a fire in a very crowded theater indeed.” Hitchens snarled: “[W]ho’s going to decide” what is acceptable to say and what is not? Indeed, who is going to decide? The arbitrary power that laws such as the Espionage Act give to the state is precisely what those who call out “assault weapons” bans and intrusive background checks seek to avoid, an upside-down presumption that rights require demonstrations of need or are contingent upon circumstance. Suffice it to say that to hear Chuck Schumer favorably referencing the most famous censorship case in the history of the country, in which the Supreme Court ruled baldly that state power was more important than the Bill of Rights, is no comfort at all.
— Charles C. W. Cooke is an editorial associate at National Review
Owen couldn’t finish a sentence lol
Tyler Evans who is Owen?
Matt Lord The younger guy. Owen Shroyer is usually the field guy.
Apathetic Infidelity I was being sarcastic
Patient as a saint
Poor Owen the destroyer
Speaking from an alcoholic stand point… If someone is sober for life… I got some questions! I just cant trust the ‘squeaky clean’!
Alex and Ted are globalist pigs.
Zachary Hughes Some of us just dislike what alcohol does to people and having their senses dulled
Yeah because they got some of that Syria flower that the elite are hunting for
He’s not a saint he’s sober
You are right to see a red flag mate Ted or who I call PED NUGENT is a pedo and is open about it. He-has songs about it . Dodgy man!
Nugent 2020. On libertarian ticket.
You know Nugent pooped his pants to dodge the draft? You know he got legal custody of a girl so he could screw her? Have you heard his lyrics?
NO WAY enough pedos in power so far Nugent is a opedo > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Nugent doesn’t hold back! AMERICA is Winning! AMERICA FIRST!!!
Nugent is a opedo > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Ted nugent can catch a badger with his bare hands
YUCK Nugent is a opedo he has a song about it & he becamelegal guardian with a 17 year old so he could pop her > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Alex,your the man,that holds the glue tofether,, your a priceless,asset to conservative right,God,country,guns,free speech,,, who are we,what can we do to help you,,,,,,please reply alex
Support the NRA more than ever
Clinton Reisig – no support the GOA, they keep the NRA from selling us out!
Those of the world will be conquered but those who come out of the world’s system and accept God’s beloved son Jesus will never die. Jesus conquered evil and won once and for all.
Ted signed my 338 and my life member NRA card. He is really a physical specimen….a stud. I dig Ted and the tone he gets out of his Gibsons
YUCK Nugent is a opedo he has a song about it & he becamelegal guardian with a 17 year old so he could pop her > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Uncle Ted
Ted Nugent is the only man on the planet that is capable of killing Chuck Norris
They are on the same side, though.
YUCK Nugent is a opedo he has a song about it & he becamelegal guardian with a 17 year old so he could pop her > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Ted Nugent really is Call of the Wild. He is what is missing in rock. Maybe best and most underrated rocker of all time is Ted Nugent cuz all his energy was from his primal core. He was not using any substances, just hunting and shooting and the wild nature
YUCK Nugent is a opedo he has a song about it & he becamelegal guardian with a 17 year old so he could pop her > He is right about guns but he is a sick man!
Ted Nugent is a very capable guy.
Schaissenberg Pondexter – no he is for he rich, not the common man
Capable of shitting his pants.