The psychology of inequality and political division | Keith Payne

Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.

"If we want to fix our politics, we have to do something about inequality," says social psychologist Keith Payne. Showing how economic inequality changes the way people see and behave towards one another, Payne helps explain the rise of the political polarization that's slicing up society — and challenges us to think twice the next time we dismiss someone for the sake of politics.

The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know.

Follow TED on Twitter:
Like TED on Facebook:
Subscribe to our channel:

TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy ( ). For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at

37 Comments on The psychology of inequality and political division | Keith Payne

  1. المقطع ما صارله ١٠ ثواني وهو نازل ومع كذا واحد حاط ديسلايك

    • @Analogy Accepted ah hah, you see. It’s not the rich that maintains the power, but the rich, in conjunction with the government. Only when government intervenes in a free market do monopolies form and are allowed long term reign.

    • @Wei Chen monopolies exist outside government control. It’s easier to maintain with government aid, sure. But a free market with enough money in it there is nothing stopping the ultra wealthy from setting up monopolies by buying out all competitors.

    • @Wei Chen Yes, in a way. No regulations is bad, too. Modern global capitalism favours large corporations, which have non-free-market ways of eliminating competition. Basically, you get global monopolies or oligopolies, like Alphabet, Apple, or national ones, like Comcast, etc.

      Proper free market is very difficult to maintain. Not impossible, just very difficult. Utopian, to be honest – you cannot have govt corruption, you must have very strong protection of the individual (consumer) via contracts, you must have very fair judicial system, very fair executive… We fail on all of those. Good luck getting all that.

      That said, regulations tend to destroy their own usefulness, and should all have built-in expiration timers, with re-evaluation.

  2. Yes, we can’t be thinking of people with different opinions, ways of life, etc as idiots, dunces and inferior in any way. If we take the time to talk, no shouting or trying to come out superior, discussion turns out to be way easier when it is done this way, at least for me

  3. I’m so glad you said that, I have my own people calling me stupid because of my beliefs and values. I definitely will think twice before I disagree with others for there viewpoints or beliefs.

  4. The world is run by organised crime. Even in “democratic” countries the rich buy enough votes to get what they want.
    The current President of USA did not get a majority of votes.
    What democracy?
    If was in a large company he would be shown the door because of his incompetence.
    Good news:-
    Our global civilization will fail soon.
    A morally bankrupt society will fail.
    A world running on Monopoly money is also doomed to fail.
    Cheers Gray
    Australia

  5. I dont want to be rich.. i jst dont want to be the mercy of an employer for survival.. universal basic income*

    Is that to much to ask?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Shares
Share This