Subscribe to our new channel! We are moving our journalism over to The Pulse, subscribe here:
Senator Rand Paul pushed back against Dr Susan Bailey about the US government's policy on COVID vaccination. Why is the government not being forthcoming about natural immunity and the reality of herd immunity?
Big tech censorship has been taking over in a big way, we have to start taking action as a community: Join our email list here to learn more and stay connected:
The only thing keeping our work going is YOU, become a CE member here: or donate here:
Instagram:
Twitter:
Subscribe to our new channel! We are moving our journalism over to The Pulse, subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRA3BtKXNdKNl0mG_hkeVYg
Thank you for sharing this.
You and your team do great work!!! Big support.
Indeed, It only takes one lie to discredit yourself! They’ve lied repeatedly and for years. Thank you Rand Paul!
Dr. Rand Paul needs to come on stronger: “While I am fully aware that there is no reasonable answer to this question, I want to see how your handlers have you try to answer it. So here goes…
cg2
vum.fyi
I don’t like the fact that Rand Paul is making statements amounting to the vaccines are safe and effective. They are not safe and they are not effective. They don’t reduce transmission at all and they barely reduce symptomology (.88% Absolute Risk Reduction value, which is the relevant value, they are relaying the Relative Risk Reduction value to the public as though it is the ARR, I could explain with math but it would take 3-4 paragraphs). He states in the hearing that 96% of patients don’t die from the vaccines and that we should be giving them to the elderly he also states that herd immunity is “as good” as vaccination. False. The mRNA non-vaccines do not do anything good for you at all. In fact, the spike proteins travel throughout the body and accumulate in the organs, per Dr. Byram Bridle’s assessment of Japan’s independent Pfizer mRNA non-vaccine research. Additionally, they skipped the animal trials? Why? How could the FDA allow this? There is a division of the FDA that makes this decision, Human Testing and Ethics or something or another, and guess who heads up this division? Anthony Fauci’s wife, who is also on the board of directors of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This isn’t the first time that they’ve tried to get mRNA non-vaccines to work. There have been, to my knowledge, 4 previous trials and every one of the trials ends with all of the specimens, first ferrets, then non-human primates, dying when exposed to the actual wild variant of whatever they were supposed to be inoculated against. This is called Pathogenic Priming – Antibody Dependent Enhancement. So knowing this outcome, they completely skipped the animal trials altogether this time around to secure their EUA because it would not look good. How can Rand Paul not know any of this? Why does it seem like he’s pulling punches / playing softball issuing statements that amount to “the vaccines are safe and effective” when they are anything but that? I wanted to share this video on my social media account but Rand Paul’s stating that these vaccines are safe and effective is going to send a mixed message.
It’s important to remember that forcing someone not to do something is as bad as forcing them to. The important thing imo at this moment is to facilitate calm and rational debate. I think it’s very important to bring the two “sides” together if we want to find the best way forward. I sometimes think that this division of well intentioned people IS the hidden agenda. Maybe it’s not such a bad idea to post it, it may open up some discussions that might not have otherwise happened. I watched a dark horse podcast about the way that young and old people have different immune responses. I’ll send you the link. Very basically the young tend to be very good at responding to new pathogens while the very old are better with things they have seen before. The older they are the less they see pathogens that they haven’t seen before. When they do it is possible for the immune system to over react. This could manifest as a cytokine storm. It may very well be the case that the risk benefit for a very old and frail person to get the covid vaccine. Just as, if you have sworn never to be vaccinated again and then happen to get bitten or scratched by a bat, fox or raccoon that you should behond any scientific and rational doubt get vaccinated against rabies. Tetanus as well if you get a deep cut or puncture wound. That being said as most people have been at some point vaccinated for tetanus a titre to test your level of antibodies could be performed. Babies on the other hand at 2 months are past the age where umbilical tetanus is a risk . Risk benefit analysis is a constantly changing and very complex and nuanced process. The fact remains that smallpox WAS eradicated and I don’t believe that the science of vaccines should be put in the history books. Like many other things these days it’s all about boxes, you are either with us or against us type thing. Perhaps that’s why I feel so out of place most of the time. I cant help but see things from 10 different sides. It seems to me you have taken the time to learn about what is happening. That is huge and the world needs people like you. There are people out there though, that, not because they are stupid, lazy or sheep that understand things differently. That difference comes only from their experience but I can assure you they DO want to help. My mom is one of them. She is the kindest person I’ve ever met. We should make room for those people and allow them to help. The world is so full of fear and anger right now I hope I didn’t make you feel either one with my response. Paul’s statement while you may not have found it perfect i think it’s much better than alot of other things. Would you like that link?
Keep doing what you’re doing! Love this channel!